🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed new appeals had been made by go-betweens to restart talks with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is walking a difficult path since Iran does not want be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, European countries exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations resume.

The American leader recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be settled by military means. He stated the attacks started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to restore.

Negotiations Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the primary answer to address conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have become stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."